Rife Therapy Approaches

Hello! Today's I am writing about what I know about rife approaches. This topic has come up in a couple conversations and I have explained it, but I think that writing it may be more clear than actually explaining it. This blog is dedicated to my friend in Colorado, in particular, as he is going back and forth between different rife approaches, not sure which one to commit to. This is not uncommon as there are many different ways to go about rife therapy and it can all be confusing and there is so little actual research published on the topic. That said, I do think it is important to commit to an approach before switching to another (at least for an extended amount of time) in order to see if it is working for you.

Before we can discuss approaches, we must first discuss machines, as the rife machine one owns can actually limit which approach is selected. There are several types of rife machines and many types of models, all which have different power levels and capabilities. I have owned 2 so far- first the Rife Digital Bioresonance (approx. $500) and then I upgraded to the GB4000 and SR4 amp (approx. $2000). The first machine only let me run one frequency at a time and its power level was under 1.5 watts. The second allows me to run up to 8 frequencies at once and its power level is 15 watts. It is my belief that in order to kill stealth infections such as Lyme, Babesia, Bartonella, Herpes, EBV, Mycoplasma, and Chlamydia Pnemonia you need a lot of power- at least 10 amps. My little machine was not able to eradicate the infections, although I do think that it did kill some of the less virulent strains of some of the infections, as evidenced by my herxing and minor improvement using it. A GB 4000 plus amp is powerful enough and so is the GB with MOPA as well as a Doug Coil Machine. There are a few others on the market that are also powerful enough, in my opinion, to eradicate stealth infections, if used properly and for long enough.

Now let's go over the basic variables. There are 4 variables at play when it comes to rifing. 1) power used, 2) length of time, 3) which frequencies are run, and 4) how many frequencies are used in any particular run. Some rife machines, like the first one I owned, did not have an adjustment for power level. So that variable could not be changed when running. It was always at the max power of just under 1.5 watts. Also, it only allowed one frequency to be run at a time so that variable could not be changed. The machine, however, would allow a user to adjust the amount of time that each frequency was run; the default was 5 minute but the time could be increased and decreased (to whatever the maximum number of minutes was). So I would input the most popular Lyme CALF frequencies and run them each for 1 minute each, then 2 minutes each the next time, then 3 minutes each, etc. I slowly built up the time as that was one of the only variables I had to work with while using that rife machine. I definitely herxed sometimes, and I believe it was because I was so incredibly sick that my machine was destroying the weakest strains and spirochetes. It definitely didn't touch the ones protected in biofilm, nor did it kill the more virulent bugs.

Many people who are writing about rifing on popular rife forums appear to be using the aforementioned approach. They are running frequencies one at a time, starting with 1-2 minutes, and then building up time used with each frequency. They may or may not be increasing the power level, depending on their rife unit and what it can and can't do, but they are working with only one frequency at a time. There is one advantage and several disadvantages to this approach, as I see it. The advantage is that it is better to run one frequency at a time with the many less powerful machines on the market today because when you run more than one (on the GB, for example) it dilutes the power. If you run the maximum 8 frequencies (on the GB), it cuts the power to each, making each frequency a little less powerful. The less powerful machines need to have all their power directed to that one frequency in order to have any killing effect, and even then, the killing effect is still not really powerful enough for destroying the most virulent bugs, even if you change another variable: increasing the time.

So what are the disadvantages beyond lack of power? One is the act of running a limited number of frequencies each session. By running only one frequency at a time (either by necessity because of the machine's limits or by choice), you are limiting how many bugs you kill with each session. Even if you run 8 different frequencies for 5 minutes each, you are only hitting the bugs that can be hit with those particular 8 frequencies. When a person is very ill with Lyme and co-infections (and other bacteria, parasites, and viruses) it is critical to lower the body's overall pathogen load as quickly as possible. If not then you risk the 'switch getting turned on.' That is an expression I got from my coach who got it from a naturopathic doctor. This doctor must have seen what I have seen: when a person is so overloaded with bugs, the disease runs its course and eventually they are diagnosed with MS, Parkinson's, dementia, or some other diagnosis which is often a sign that the person is so far gone that they cannot reverse the disease process, no matter what kind of rife machine they own and no matter how dedicated they are to treatment. Rife treatment and subsequent recovery is a race- not a sprint but a marathon- and in the beginning, if a person is very sick (which for definition purposes define as being unable to work) then they need to get their bug load down FAST and out pace the degree to which each pathogen can reproduce. You must kill them before they increase their numbers, taking over more body systems. When you own a GB (or other machine that is at least 10 watts of power) and you run multiple frequencies at once, you are killing more bugs with each run session. It is fine that the power is divided by the number of frequencies because the need to reduce the bug load outweighs the need to kill the most virulent bugs. With time, and with increasing the power and time, you can eventually get the more virulent bugs. Think of the flyswatter analogy I used in a previous post. In the beginning, it is important to kill more bugs, so it is better to use a flyswatter to kill a mound of ants (versus a more powerful hammer) because of its surface area. Sure, you will stun some of the bugs but you will also kill more than you would kill with a blow of the hammer!

In the beginning of therapy, you must run as many frequencies as possible as it will cast a wider net. This is especially true if you are infected with more than just Lyme- and you probably are! Now for another limit of running one frequency at a time. There is no exact science behind the CALF list. There is really very little money going into rife research and much of Royal Rife's research was destroyed. This means that, unfortunately, there is no guarantee that say frequency 432 will kill your particular strain of Lyme, EVEN IF YOU RUN IT FOR 2 HOURS at 200 amps of power!!! There are many strains of Lyme, many frequencies that people report work, and for each strain, there are bugs that morph and change their DNA in order to survive the frequency, rendering it ineffective. Thus, I cherish the beauty behind the GB4000 and its sweep function! If I run 432, for example, for 10 minutes on a certain power level, I will always sweep it (running 3-5 below and 3-5 frequencies above) in order to kill the mutants. For example, following running 432 for 10 minutes, I would sweep from 427 to 437 for at least 10 minutes at the same power level. Why am I admitting that I run individual frequencies? It is because I have worked up to it and I am over 3 years into treatment and my bug load is way way down, no longer in 'the danger zone' so I am going after the most virulent bugs. In order to do so, and because my machine is at full power (no ability to change the power variable any more) I make sure all the power goes to each frequency so it is not diluted. I can run 6 frequencies with each custom channel and so my sessions tend to run 30 minutes (each a G6) and then I channel sweep them for another 30 minutes and then run another custom channel, and so on. If I run for 2 hours, I am still hitting only 12 frequencies, but with lots of power, and then I am hitting the frequencies just above and below them. This is necessary to give me a herx this late in treatment. In the beginning, I ran 8 frequencies at a time, up to 50+ in order to cast a wider net because I did not require that much power to get a 'hit' (a herx). Lower power levels always made me herx. When they no longer did, I adjusted a variable (only one at a time)- adding more power, or adding more time.

I hope this written explanation is clear and that it makes sense. As always, these views are expressly my opinions, and they are based on my experience and the experience of others I know. You are free to disagree with them- but as I write in my book- 'proof is in the pudding'. Some people using the single frequency rife approach may, in fact, get relief, but are they 100% better now (i.e. no lifestyle 'adjustments' or 'modifications' needed and no relapses)? Are the people who claim to be better and who have used a weaker machine truly free of Lyme and all other stealth infections? Do they require maintenance sessions and herbals or antibiotics from time to time? How well do you really know the people posting on forums and their true picture of health? I guess you don't really know me for that matter, but my claims stand; I am working full time. I go out when I like for as late as I like. I have hobbies including running. I can drink if I want without symptoms. I can eat what I want without symptoms. I have not relapsed. I do not need to lead a 'stress free' lifestyle in order to stay well- although I try to. Good luck and God bless!